"Key financial metrics, on a last twelve months basis (LTM), showed a substantial improvement over the previous quarter given the rolling off of third quarter 2011 when Noble reported a quarterly loss; however the metrics remain weak for Noble's Baa3 rating, which have already been factored into the current negative outlook," says Laura Acres, a Moody's Senior Vice President.
Noble achieved record nine month revenues of US$69.8 billion, an increase of 15.1% year-on-year, but the third quarter growth rate had slowed substantially to 8.7% from the 23% we saw in second quarter 2012. The improvement was substantially driven by the energy segment, particularly growth in gas and power volumes post expansion into Europe.
Indeed, the pace of revenue growth in energy, at 27% for the nine months was more than sufficient to offset revenue declines of 19% in the agriculture segment where unseasonal rains in Brazil had delayed sugar cane harvests into the third quarter and weak crushing margins reduced volumes in grains & oilseeds.
Notwithstanding the fact that utilization at the Brazilian sugar mills have improved, the Agriculture segment continues to underperform due to continuing weak crushing margins in China and South America.
Noble also reported $1,172.1 million in operating income from supply chain for nine months 2012, an increase of 3.1% and a record for the group. The decline in the agricultural segment was more than offset by improvements in the energy and MMO segments.
While showing an improving trend on an LTM basis, the Q3 2012 performance was lacklustre -- in fact adjusted EBITDA had fallen approximately 30% compared to Q2 2012; however there is a degree of seasonality to Q3 numbers typically. Notwithstanding this, Noble was able to reduce its reported debt level further which now stands at $5.7 billion -- the lowest level since at least Q2 2010. Noble continued to focus on improving working capital efficiency. Balance sheet cash--excluding cash with futures brokers--remained stable to historical levels at about US$850 million.
Adjusted net debt/EBITDA for the LTM improved to about 3.7x from 4.0x, in part because of the exclusion of a very weak Q3 2011 in the calculations -- in isolation, the annualized Q3 2012 figure stood at about 4.4x. LTM retained cash flow ("RCF")/adjusted net debt picked up to about 13% from the year end 2011 position.
Noble continues to pursue asset monetization initiatives, including the merger between Gloucester Coal Limited and Yanzhou Coal Mining Company, and the sale of Terminal Maritimo do Maranhao S.A. in Brazil, the proceeds of which will help to lower Noble's financial leverage as proceeds are deployed towards a reduction in net debt. The Gloucester Coal merger is complete although the final cashflow of $357 million for the repayment of the promissory note will not be received until 3 January 2013. The impact of this cash inflow will reduce pro forma LTM adjusted net debt/EBITDA to about 3.5x.
While the improvement in the LTM operating results and progress of its asset monetization initiatives are encouraging, it remains uncertain if the company can improve its financial profile to a level more in line with the current rating, given the challenging economic outlook. Moody's will continue to monitor the company's ability to improve earnings and cash flow, and its progress in reducing leverage through a combination of asset monetization, lower capex and cost management initiatives over the next 6-12 months.
Noble's Baa3 rating continues to be supported by its scale and diversified product portfolio, as well as its sound liquidity profile, with free cash--excluding restricted cash with future brokers--of around US$850 million and undrawn committed credit facilities of around US$5.1 billion. This is sufficient to cover all of its total reported debt outstanding of US$5.7 billion. Of note is the increase in short term debt given that Noble's US$500 million 8.5% senior notes mature on 30 May 2013, although refinancing of this is not considered to be a problem.
The rating outlook could revert to stable if Noble can improve its financial profile by enhancing its RCF and containing its debt levels through asset monetization, such that RCF/ adjusted net debt trends towards 20% and adjusted net debt/EBITDA remains below 3.5x-4.0x.
On the other hand, downward rating pressure could emerge if: 1) liquidity weakens, 2) EBITDA margin erodes, 3) the company undertakes aggressive debt-funded expansion, and, 4) its financial profile deteriorates over an extended period. Credit metrics that Moody's would consider include adjusted net debt/EBITDA exceeding 3.5x-4x and RCF/adjusted net debt failing to trend towards 20%.
The principal methodology used in rating Noble Group Limited was the Global Commodity Merchandising & Processing Companies Industry Methodology published in December 2011. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
Noble is the largest global trader and supply-chain manager in Asia. It is engaged in the sourcing, storage, transportation, and distribution of agricultural, energy, and industrial products. It is headquartered in Hong Kong and listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange.
Laura Acres Senior Vice President Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service Hong Kong Ltd. 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Hong Kong China (Hong Kong S.A.R.) JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 Gary Lau MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd. 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Hong Kong China (Hong Kong S.A.R.) JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.