USD375 million of rated debt affected

Frankfurt am Main, July 13, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded to B2 from B1 the corporate family rating (CFR) and probability of default rating (PDR) of Hyva Global B.V. (Hyva). Concurrently, the rating agency has downgraded to B2 from B1 the rating on Hyva's USD375 million of senior secured notes due 2016. The outlook on the ratings is stable.

Downgrades: ..Issuer: Hyva Global B.V..... Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B2 from B1

.... Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B2 from B1

....Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to B2 (LGD4 - 51%) from B1 (LGD4 - 51%)

Outlook Actions: ..Issuer: Hyva Global B.V.....Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

"Today's rating action reflects our view that the difficult operating environment in China and the uncertain outlook for European truck demand will negatively affect Hyva's operating performance and credit metrics in the current financial year, with the result that they will no longer be commensurate with its previous rating," says Kathrin Heitmann, an Analyst in Moody's Corporate Finance Group and lead analyst for Hyva.

Moody's currently expects demand for Hyva's hydraulic cylinders in China to remain depressed by the weakness in the construction machinery sector at least through the second quarter of 2012. However, the rating agency believes that demand could stabilise in the second half of the year, with the potential for a modest recovery in 2013.

Against this, Moody's expects that Hyva will materially underperform against its business plan presented at the time of debt issuance, and that it will be unable to restore its debt/EBITDA ratio towards the 4.0x level factored into the rating. For 2011, Moody's estimates that Hvya had pro-forma leverage, measured by adjusted debt/EBITDA, of around 4.5x. Indeed, the rating agency forecasts that Hyva's leverage will remain at or above this level in the current financial year. This reflects continued revenue and earnings pressure, as well as only modest positive free cash flow generation should management be able to substantially reverse the build-up in its working capital in the first quarter. Such credit metrics position the company more adequately in the B2 rating category.

Hyva intends to concentrate its management team in China, reflecting its increased business focus on emerging markets in Asia, which fits well into management's strategy. In Moody's view, the relocation may affect the company's ability to effectively manage the cost-cutting necessary to respond to the slowdown in some of its markets, as well as to manage working capital swings. This view also takes into account the company's relatively small scale and the risk that competitive pressure in China might increase over time. Therefore, Moody's considers the company to be more vulnerable to cyclicality than at the time the rating agency assigned the B1 rating in 2011.

Moody's notes that, in the first quarter of 2012, Hyva's group revenues fell by 13% year-on-year to USD176 million, mainly as a result of a 34% year-on-year decline in revenues from China. Notably, revenues in China stabilised compared with the weak levels of the fourth quarter of 2011 (+13%). Revenues in the Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) region remained stable and continued to grow by 7% year-on-year in India and the Americas during the same quarter.

As a result, the group's reported pro-forma EBITDA margin declined to 11.1% in the first quarter of 2012 from 13.1% in financial year (FY) 2011. More subdued demand and a seasonal working capital build-up led to negative free cash flow generation of USD17 million during the first quarter.

Hyva's ratings reflect the company's (1) modest scale, with revenues of around USD767 million pro-forma FY 2011 results; (2) exposure to the inherent cyclicality of the commercial vehicle and construction equipment industry; (3) concentration of risk, with a narrow product base and a high exposure to the developing markets of China and India; and (4) relatively high leverage pro-forma December 2011 figures, with adjusted debt/EBITDA of around 4.5x.

However, Hyva's ratings continue to be supported by the company's (1) international presence, with a strong footprint in emerging markets in Asia and the Americas; (2) leadership in core markets based on market share, brand, product, efficiency and reliability, as well as by an established global service network; (3) flexible cost base, with low operating leverage; and (4) balanced debt maturity profile, with no material debt maturing before 2015.

Hyva's liquidity includes a current cash balance of USD67 million at 31 March 2012 and a committed revolving credit facility (RCF) of USD30 million due 2015. Seasonal working capital movements, while negatively affected by the current slowdown in China, remain sufficiently covered by cash on the balance sheet and access to the revolving credit facility. However, Moody's cautions that currently significant headroom under financial covenants (leverage, cash flow cover) could diminish if Hyva's operating performance and cash flow generation capacity continue to deteriorate.

The stable rating outlook is based on Moody's expectation that Hyva will be able to maintain current credit metrics despite some headwinds from subdued demand in China and macroeconomic uncertainty. The stable outlook also incorporates Moody's view that Hyva will maintain an adequate liquidity profile with sufficient headroom under financial covenants.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATINGS UP/DOWN

Moody's could consider upgrading Hyva's rating if the company were to (1) generate consistently positive free cash flow and achieve debt/EBITDA at or below 4.0x; (2) maintain a conservative financial policy and adequate short-term liquidity profile; (3) successfully manage the transfer of certain corporate functions to China and maintain strict control of operations.

Conversely, downward pressure on the rating could arise if there were a further deterioration in Hyva's operating performance or the company were to engage in a more aggressive financial policy that results in (1) Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA above 5.0x for a prolonged period of time; (2) negative free cash flow; or (3) reduced covenant headroom.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in rating Hyva Global B.V. was the Global Heavy Manufacturing Rating Methodology published in November 2009. Other methodologies used include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.

Hyva is a leading global provider of hydraulic (tipping) solutions for the commercial vehicle industry. Hyva is also an important player in the manufacturing and supply of truck-mounted cranes, hook and skip loaders, as well as compactors and waste-collecting units for the environmental services industry. For the financial year ended 31 December 2011, Hyva reported pro-forma revenues of USD767 million. Hyva is majority-owned by private equity funds managed by Unitas Capital and NWS Holdings, a flagship infrastructure arm of New World Group.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Kathrin Heitmann Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sDeutschland GmbH An der Welle 5 Frankfurt am Main 60322 Germany JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Matthias Hellstern Associate Managing Director Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody's Deutschland GmbH An der Welle 5 Frankfurt am Main 60322 Germany JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.