New York, November 06, 2012 --
Moody's Ratings
Issue: Combined Fee Revenue Building Bonds, Series 2012; Rating: Aa3; Sale Amount: $70,820,000; Expected Sale Date: 11-14-2012; Rating Description: Revenue: Public University Broad Pledge
Issue: Combined Fee Revenue Building Bonds, Taxable Series 2012A; Rating: Aa3; Sale Amount: $5,825,000; Expected Sale Date: 11-14-2012; Rating Description: Revenue: Public University Broad Pledge
Opinion
Moody's Investors Service has assigned an Aa3 rating to Austin Community College District's (ACCD) $70.8 million fixed rate Combined Fee Revenue Building Bonds, Series 2012 and $5.8 million of Taxable Series 2012A. At this time, we are also affirming the Aa3 rating on the college's outstanding revenue bonds. The rating outlook has been revised to negative from stable.
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE
The Aa3 rating reflects the college's sizeable enrollment base and location in a demographically vibrant area, large and diverse revenue base, and conservative debt structure. These credit strengths are offset by growing capital needs of the expanding college resulting in rapid increase in debt without similar growth in revenues, declines in operating performance, limited financial resources relative to debt and operations, and two years of enrollment declines.
The negative outlook reflects the expectation that the college will be challenged to grow financial resources and operating revenues commensurate with the current increase in revenue debt, and sustain further enrollment declines or stagnation given Austin's relatively healthy economy and the lack of specific plans to significantly address the countercyclical nature of enrollment relative to unemployment rates. In addition, the college is expected to continue to issue up to $500 million of additional debt for capital projects planned over the next 10 years, although this debt is expected to be supported by local tax revenues. The negative outlook also incorporates the warning status of the college's accreditation, which will be ruled on by the regional accrediting agency by June 2013, and addresses managerial challenges associated with oversight of this rapidly growing district.
CHALLENGES
*Very limited financial resource base with FY 2011 total financial resources of $47.7 million. Expendable financial resources of $43.7 million cushion pro-forma debt (includes revenue bonds, general obligations bonds and lease revenue bonds) by 0.09 times and operations by 0.17 times.
*Accreditation placed on warning by regional accreditor, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (commonly referred to as SACS) in December 2011, and continued by SACS in June 2012; ACCD has responded with monitoring report concurrent with 10-year accreditation review.
*Softening student demand reflected in second year of declining enrollment, as the economy improves and more students return to the labor force. Some competition for students exists from regional four-year public and private institutions although the college is the only institution offering occupational training, comprehensive evening programs and open door admissions.
*Limited financial flexibility with current tax rates at the voter approved tax caps. In FY 2011, the college levies $.90 per $1,000 assessed valuation maintenance and operations ad valorem taxes.
*Additional capital needs, with approximately $500 million of identified capital projects over the next ten years to be funded by tax supported bonds.
*Narrow debt service coverage with a three year average (FY 2009-2011) of 1.1 times.
STRENGTHS
*Solid market position as provider of two-year education in Austin, Texas (rated Aaa). The district is attractively priced for in-district and out-of-district students, particularly in comparison to four-year institutions in the region. The college maintains a strong academic focus with approximately 40% of students transferring to four-year institutions.
*Diversified $251.7 million operating revenue base in FY 2011, that helps insulate the college from declines in state appropriations and cyclicality of community college enrollment with tuition, auxiliaries and student fees comprising 27% of revenue, state appropriations comprising 24% and ad valorem taxes of 40% of revenue.
*Debt outstanding is all fixed rate.
*Significant headroom to increase tax rates expressly for debt service and ability to annex additional school districts.
OUTLOOK
The negative outlook reflects the expectation that the college will be challenged to grow financial resources and operating revenues commensurate with the current increase in revenue debt, and sustain further enrollment declines or stagnation given Austin's relatively healthy economy and the lack of specific plans to significantly address the countercyclical nature of enrollment relative to unemployment rates. In addition, the college is expected to continue to issue up to $500 million of additional debt for capital projects planned over the next 10 years, although this debt is expected to be supported by local tax revenues. The negative outlook also incorporates the warning status of the college's accreditation, which will be ruled on by the regional accrediting agency by June 2013, and addresses managerial challenges associated with oversight of this rapidly growing district.
WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP
Not likely given the negative outlook. Substantial growth of financial resources base; adequate enrollment growth to support new debt and sustain positive, or improve, operations
WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN
Continuation of accreditation warning or negative sanction past June 2013 SACS meeting; further deterioration of operating performance as calculated by Moody's; weakening student market position; additional debt issuance without commensurate financial resource growth; decline in financial resources; lack of management response to adjust expenses should revenues fall short of budget
METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in this rating was Moody's Approach for Evaluating Community Colleges published in December 1999. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody'sInvestors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service's information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Caitlin Bertha Associate Analyst Public Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653Jenny L. Maloney Vice President - Senior Analyst Public Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody'sOverseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.